ArticleData in brief2022
Data on the frequency and causes of icteric interference in clinical chemistry laboratory tests.
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Two-Step Model for Automated Serum Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of elevated levels of bilirubin (icterus) in serum or plasma specimens has the potential to interfere with clinical chemistry and other laboratory assays. Along with hemolysis and lipemia, icterus represents one of the most common endogenous interferences with laboratory tests. There are two common mechanisms by which icterus can cause assay interference. The first common mechanism is spectral interference due to absorption at wavelengths used in assays by bilirubin and/or bilirubin breakdown products. The second common mechanism involves chemical reaction of bilirubin with the reagents used in some enzymatic assays. Most automated clinical chemistry platforms can perform rapid estimates of indices for hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL), typically by measuring absorbance at wavelengths impacted by these interferences. The data in this article provides results from a detailed 12-month retrospective review of icteric indices and the impact on 114 clinical chemistry assays at an academic medical center in the United States. The data include 414,502 specimens from 94,081 unique patients (51,851 females; 42,230 males), with a total of 2,791,591 discrete clinical chemistry assays performed on the specimens. Detailed chart review was performed for all patients who had one or more specimens with an icteric index of 40 or higher ('severe icterus'), including determination of the medical diagnoses likely causing icterus and the mortality of these patients within 1 and 3 years following laboratory testing. Data for all specimens include patient location at time of testing (emergency department, inpatient unit, or outpatient site), sex, age, HIL indices, specific clinical chemistry assays performed, and number of times specimens had icteric indices exceeding the icteric index threshold in the package inserts for the clinical chemistry assays performed. The dataset reported is related to the research entitled "Frequency of Icteric Interference in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Tests and Causes of Severe Icterus" [S. Mainali, A.E. Merrill, M.D. Krasowski, Frequency of icteric interference in clinical chemistry laboratory tests and causes of severe icterus, Pract. Lab. Med. (2021) 27: e00259].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.