Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036447›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes research2022

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lifestyle Intervention and Pioglitazone for Normalization of Glucose Status in Chinese with Prediabetes.

Yingying Luo, Hongyuan Wang, Xianghai Zhou, Cuiqing Chang, Wei Chen, Xiaohui Guo, Jinkui Yang, Linong Ji, Sanjoy K Paul

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prediabetes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yingying LuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongyuan WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Xianghai ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cuiqing ChangInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaohui GuoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jinkui YangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linong JiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-2168
Sanjoy K PaulMelbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-7194
Peking University · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrediabetes has been proved as an important risk factor of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Previous studies have shown that both lifestyle intervention and pioglitazone may delay the development of diabetes in patients with prediabetes. However, no study has ever explored whether these interventions could revert prediabetes to normal glycemic status as the primary outcome. Interventions that may revert prediabetes back to normal glucose status would be of great clinical importance. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a randomized, multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial designed study to examine whether intensive lifestyle intervention and/or pioglitazone could revert prediabetes to normal glucose tolerance. The participants were followed up for three years unless they reverted to normal glucose state or developed diabetes at the annual oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Reversion to normal glucose tolerance was confirmed on the basis of the results of OGTT.

resultsIn our study, 1945 eligible patients were ultimately randomized into four groups. In this three-year follow-up study, overall, 60.0%, 50.3%, 56.6% and 65.1% reverted back to normoglycemic state over 3 years of follow-up in the conventional lifestyle intervention plus placebo, intensive lifestyle intervention plus placebo, conventional lifestyle intervention plus pioglitazone, and intensive lifestyle intervention plus pioglitazone groups, respectively. Compared to the conventional lifestyle intervention plus placebo group, all the other three groups did not show any significant benefit in terms of reverting back to normoglycemic state.

conclusionIn our study, for patients with prediabetes, neither intensive lifestyle intervention nor pioglitazone had led to a higher reversion rate to normal glucose state.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseLife StyleAdultAgedChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPioglitazonePrediabetic StateRisk Reduction BehaviorTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazone

Identifiers

PMID35036447
PMCPMC8759441
OpenAlexW4206506031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.