Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036417›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Community-acquired pneumonia subgroups and differential response to corticosteroids: a secondary analysis of controlled studies.

Esther Wittermans, Philip A van der Zee, Hongchao Qi, Ewoudt M W van de Garde, Claudine A Blum, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Diederik Gommers, Jan C Grutters, G Paul Voorn, Willem Jan W Bos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Candent issues in pneumonia. Reflections from the Fifth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2023.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther WittermansDept of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Philip A van der ZeeDept of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5577-6848
Hongchao QiDept of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewoudt M W van de GardeDept of Clinical Pharmacology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-2144
Claudine A BlumDepts of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, and Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Medical University Clinic, Aarau, Switzerland.
Mirjam Christ-CrainDepts of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Diederik GommersDept of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan C GruttersDept of Pulmonology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
G Paul VoornDept of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Willem Jan W BosDept of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Henrik EndemanDept of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLKantonsspital Aarau · CHSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatent class analysis (LCA) has identified subgroups with meaningful treatment implications in acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed a secondary analysis of three studies to assess whether LCA can identify clinically distinct subgroups in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and whether the treatment effect of adjunctive corticosteroids differs between subgroups.

methodsLCA was performed on baseline clinical and biomarker data from the Ovidius trial (n=304) and the Steroids in Pneumonia (STEP) trial (n=727), both randomised controlled trials investigating adjunctive corticosteroid treatment in CAP, and the observational TripleP cohort (n=201). Analyses were conducted independently in two cohorts (Ovidius-TripleP combined and the STEP trial). In both cohorts, differences in clinical outcomes and response to adjunctive corticosteroid treatment were examined between subgroups identified through LCA.

resultsA two-class model fitted both cohorts best. Class 2 patients had more signs of systemic inflammation compared to class 1. In both cohorts, length of stay was longer and in-hospital mortality rate was higher in class 2. In the Ovidius trial, corticosteroids reduced the median length of stay in class 2 (6.5

conclusionsIn two independent cohorts, LCA identified two classes of CAP patients with different clinical characteristics and outcomes. Given the different response to adjunctive corticosteroids in the Ovidius trial, LCA might provide a useful basis to improve patient selection for future trials.

Identifiers

PMID35036417
PMCPMC8752939
OpenAlexW3212060594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.