Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036347›Full record

ReviewJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2022

Role of herbal medicines in the management of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ansul Kumar, Arpita Rai, Mohd Saif Khan, Amit Kumar, Zeya Ul Haque, Mohammad Fazil, Gulam Rabbani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inhibitory Effects ofACS omega · 2024
    Article
  3. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prospect of herbal medication as prevention against COVID variants.Journal of King Saud University. Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ansul KumarRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), CTVS Department, Bariatu, Ranchi, 834009, India.
Arpita RaiOral Medicine and Radiology, Dental Institute. Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Bariatu, Ranchi, 834009, India.
Mohd Saif KhanCritical Care Medicine, New Trauma Centre & Central Emergency, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Bariatu, Ranchi, 834009, India.
Amit KumarRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) Dept of Lab Medicine, Bariatu, Ranchi, 834009, India.
Zeya Ul HaqueRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), CTVS Department, Bariatu, Ranchi, 834009, India.
Mohammad FazilHakim Ajmal Khan Institute of Literary and Historical Research in Unani Medicine, CCRUM, Jamia Millia Islamia Campus, New Delhi, 110025, India.
Gulam RabbaniCHC-Karra, Khunti, Jharkhand, 835209, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe management of the worldwide spreading COVID-19 consists of amelioration of its symptoms but no cure is yet available. Herbal medicines supplemented with the Western medicine have been applied for COVID-19 treatment in India, China, Iran, and other countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluates the effect and safety of herbal intervention in the management of COVID-19. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: RCTs from databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Science Direct, CTRI, AYUSH Research Portal, India, were reviewed and the data were extracted for study sample demographics, intervention details, clinical effect, inflammatory markers and safety monitoring. Outcomes were expressed as Risk-ratio (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data, and Mean-Difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous data. RESULT AND

conclusionFrom the 32 eligible studies, a total of 3177 COVID-19 patients were included in the review. Herbal intervention as an adjuvant to Western medicine causes significantly higher improvement compared to Western medicine alone [Fever (RR = 1.09 CI 1.03, 1.15), Cough (Risk-Ratio = 1.22 CI 1.08, 1.37), Fatigue (Risk-Ratio = 1.27 CI 1.11, 1.44), Chest CT Improvement (Risk-Ratio = 1.15 CI 1.08, 1.23)]. The laboratory parameters were also better in the herbal medicine group compared to standard care group only WBC (MD = 0.36 CI 0.16, 0.55), Lymphocyte percentage (MD = 5.48 CI 3.05, 7.92), Absolute lymphocyte count (MD = 0.23 CI 0.07, 0.39), CRP (MD = -5.66 CI -7.96, -3.37). However, duration of hospital stays (MD = -1.82 CI -3.84, 0.21); IL-6 (MD = -3.67 CI -8.76, 1.43), ESR Level (MD = -10.38 CI -25.96, 5.21) were statistically insignificant. No significant adverse events for herbal medications were noted in the included RCTs, during the time of the studies. (n = 665, RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.76, 1.14).

Indexed as

COVID-19Herbal medicineMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35036347
PMCPMC8747767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.