Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036316›Full record

ArticleMetabolic engineering communications2022

Production of human milk fat substitute by engineered strains of

Govindprasad Bhutada, Guillaume Menard, Rupam Kumar Bhunia, Piotr P Hapeta, Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro, Peter J Eastmond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolic engineering communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering yeast for tailored fatty acid profiles.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The microbial food revolution.Nature communications · 2023
    Review
  8. EngineeringSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Govindprasad BhutadaPlant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Guillaume MenardPlant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Rupam Kumar BhuniaPlant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Piotr P HapetaDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, UK.
Rodrigo Ledesma-AmaroDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW72AZ, UK.
Peter J EastmondPlant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Rothamsted Research · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human milk fat has a distinctive stereoisomeric structure where palmitic acid is esterified to the middle (sn-2) position on the glycerol backbone of the triacylglycerol and unsaturated fatty acids to the outer (sn-1/3) positions. This configuration allows for more efficient nutrient absorption in the infant gut. However, the fat used in most infant formulas originates from plants, which exclude palmitic acid from the sn-2 position. Oleaginous yeasts provide an alternative source of lipids for human nutrition. However, these yeasts also exclude palmitic acid from the sn-2 position of their triacylglycerol. Here we show that

Indexed as

Human milk fatLipidsMetabolic engineeringOPOYarrowia lipolyticaβ-Palmitate

Identifiers

PMID35036316
PMCPMC8752951
OpenAlexW4225887248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.