ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022
Long-term follow-up of children with a surgically treated clubfoot: Assessing the multi-segment-foot motions, dynamic plantar pressures, and functional outcomes.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling the Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Talipes Equinovarus (Clubfoot).Molecular syndromology · 2026Review
- A new approach for assessment of clubfoot treatment using non-radiological scanner coupling finite element.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Genetics, epidemiology and management of clubfoot and related disorders.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument into the Italian Language.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare surgically treated clubfoot with typically developing (TD) children using plantar pressure, multi-segment-foot kinematic analysis, and multiple functional outcomes in comprehensive and long-term study. Methods: 26 patients with 45 clubfeet and 23 TD children with 45 normal feet were evaluated. Most clubfoot patients had a complete subtalar release and a few patients had a posterior medial-lateral release at the mean age of 5 years and 6 months. The mean age at follow-up for clubfoot was 12 years and 5 months. Subjects underwent physical and radiographic examination, plantar pressure analysis, multi-segment-foot motion analysis, AAOS Foot & Ankle Questionnaire (AAOS-FAQ), the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).
resultsClubfoot patients scored significantly worse than TD on the AAOS-FAQ (90.9 vs.99.9 for pain and comfort), the CBCL Problems scale (23.1 vs.6.3), and several subscales of the PODCI (86.5 vs.96.7 for Sports and Physical Functioning) (P<0.05). Peak pressure at the lateral heel (25.6 vs.29.6 N/cm
conclusionThis study supports evidence that surgically treated clubfoot continues to have residual deformity of forefoot, overcorrection of hindfoot, stiffness, and a decrease in physical functioning. This comprehensive study accurately portrays postsurgical clubfoot function with objective means through appropriate technologies. A plantar pressure redistributed and finite element analysis designed orthosis may be of importance in the improvement of the foot and ankle joint function for ambulatory children with a relapse of clubfoot deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.