ArticleCureus2021
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Three-Year Single-Centre Experience Including During COVID-19.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [The clinical importance of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- [The COVID-19 pandemic had significant impact on duration of surgery and hospitalization time for patients after cholecystectomy].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease - 19 Pandemic on the Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Adult Patients with Acute Appendicitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a recognised treatment modality for acute cholecystitis. Traditionally, its use was reserved for patients deemed unfit for surgery. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a detrimental effect on both elective and emergency surgery. The utilisation of cholecystostomy thus increased. Unanswered questions remain over timing with respect to interval cholecystectomy. We evaluated our local practice over the preceding three years. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who had a percutaneous cholecystostomy inserted over a three-year period (1 January 2018-1 January 2021). The primary outcome was time to cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes were cholecystostomy-related complications, 30-day mortality, cholecystectomy-related complications and length of postoperative hospital stay. Results A total of 31 patients were identified during the period. Thirteen (42%) patients went on to have a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The median time interval from cholecystostomy to cholecystectomy was 97 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 81-140, minimum: 47 and maximum: 791). One case was complicated by small bowel perforation; this occurred after an interval of 106 days. The median length of postoperative stay was one day (IQR: 1-1, minimum: 0 and maximum: 4). Cholecystostomy-related complications were observed in four (13%) patients, whereby three became displaced and one developed blockage. Thirty-day mortality following cholecystostomy insertion was zero. Conclusions Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a safe and effective intervention for the management of acute cholecystitis. Interval cholecystectomy should be carefully considered; it may be safer to perform prior to 90 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.