Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036161›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

An estimate of the area of occupancy and population size of

Marcos R Bornschein, Júnior Nadaline, Luiz Fernando Ribeiro, Giovanna Sandretti-Silva, Maria Fernanda Ferreira Rivas, Bruno de Morais Guerra, Larissa Teixeira

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcos R BornscheinInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Júnior NadalineDepartamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando RibeiroMater Natura-Instituto de Estudos Ambientais, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Giovanna Sandretti-SilvaInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Ferreira RivasInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno de Morais GuerraInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Larissa TeixeiraInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe are experiencing a global crisis in conservation, which has led to the prioritization of targets, such as nations, regions, and animal groups, which are necessary while resources are disputed. Brazil is a priority not only because of its megadiversity, high rates of endemism, and frequent descriptions of new species but also because of its high levels of deforestation. Among the species groups prioritized for conservation is the anurans (Amphibia: Anura), the population of which is severely declining. One group of anurans is the genus

methodsWe searched for new populations during 2016-2020, evaluated

resultsWe recorded the species in seven new localities (from 715-1,140 m above sea level) in the state of São Paulo up to 33 km from the type locality of the species (in state of Paraná). We estimated the area of occupancy as 148.44 km

Indexed as

Bamboo impactsDensityEdge effectEndangeredForest fireFountain speciesGeographic distributionManagementPalm heart harvestingSecondary vegetation

Identifiers

PMID35036161
PMCPMC8710056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.