In one paragraphArticle in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Miguel BascurDepartamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Simon A MorleyBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7761-660X Michael P MeredithBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carlos P Muñoz-RamírezInstituto de Entomología, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-5476 David K A BarnesBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chester J SandsBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-0328 Oscar SchofieldCenter for Ocean Observing Leadership, Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-4131 Alejandro Román-GonzalézCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Leyla CárdenasCentro FONDAP de Investigación en Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL), Valdivia, Chile.
Hugh VenablesBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Antonio BranteDepartamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Ángel UrzúaDepartamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
British Antarctic Survey · GBUniversidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción · CLAustral University of Chile · CLConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARMetropolitan University of Educational Sciences · CLRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Exeter · GB
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is a hotspot for environmental change and has a strong environmental gradient from North to South. Here, for the first time we used adult individuals of the bivalve
Indexed as
BivalveFatty acidInfaunalInvertebratePhysiology
Identifiers
PMID35036155
PMCPMC8706337
OpenAlexW4200611541
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390