Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35036119›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Understanding the transmission dynamics of

Elizabeth M Antaki-Zukoski, Xunde Li, Bruce Hoar, John M Adaska, Barbara A Byrne, Edward R Atwill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth M Antaki-ZukoskiDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-4816
Xunde LiDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Bruce HoarCollege of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
John M AdaskaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Barbara A ByrneDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-1272
Edward R AtwillDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Institute for Food Safety and Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Wyoming · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of

methodsThe objective of this study is to (1) identify host, pathogen, and management risk factors associated with naturally infected feedlot cattle excreting high concentrations of

resultsIn the feedlots, prevalence of infection with DISCUSSION: Under the conditions of this experiment, super-shedding appears to be the result of cattle ingesting a high dose of any strain of

Indexed as

Bio-burdenEscherichia coli O157:H7Feedlot cattleIngested doseStrainSuper-shedders

Identifiers

PMID35036119
PMCPMC8697766
OpenAlexW4200442056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.