Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035870›Full record

ArticleAoB PLANTS2022

Can field botany be effectively taught as a distance course? Experiences and reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alistair G Auffret, Adam Ekholm, Aino Hämäläinen, Mats Jonsell, Carl Lehto, Michelle Nordkvist, Erik Öckinger, Peter Torstensson, Maria Viketoft, Göran Thor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alistair G AuffretDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Adam EkholmDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Aino HämäläinenDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats JonsellDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Carl LehtoDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Michelle NordkvistDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik ÖckingerDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter TorstenssonDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria ViketoftDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Göran ThorDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic that started in 2020 forced a rapid change in university teaching, with large numbers of courses switching to distance learning with very little time for preparation. Courses involving many practical elements and field excursions required particular care if students were to fulfil planned learning outcomes. Here, we present our experiences in teaching field botany in 2020 and 2021. Using a range of methods and tools to introduce students to the subject, promote self-learning and reflection and give rapid and regular feedback, we were able to produce a course that allowed students to achieve the intended learning outcomes and that obtained similarly positive student evaluations to previous years. The course and its outcomes were further improved in 2021. We describe how we structured field botany as a distance course in order that we could give the best possible learning experience for the students. Finally, we reflect on how digital tools can aid teaching such subjects in the future, in a world where public knowledge of natural history is declining.

Indexed as

Floristicslearningonline coursepedagogicsplant identificationteaching

Identifiers

PMID35035870
PMCPMC8757578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.