ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors of Sepsis Patients in Intensive Care Unit Based on Data Analysis.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Point-of-Care Serum Proenkephalin as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Septic Shock.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-III database.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Chemo Markers as Biomarkers in Septic Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Their Utility and Clinical Applications.Cureus · 2023Review
- Retracted: Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors of Sepsis Patients in Intensive Care Unit Based on Data Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Thromboelastography Parameters in Urosepsis: A Retrospective Study.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, a data-enabled analysis of the prognostic risk factors of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit is presented. For this purpose, we have selected 220 sepsis patients, preferably those admitted to the intensive care unit for treatment in a tertiary a hospital in Tianjin from June 2018 to June 2019 and received complete data as the research objects, to explore the prognostic risk factors of sepsis patients in the intensive care unit. All patients met the SSC sepsis diagnosis guidelines and recorded the patients' age, gender, underlying disease, and infection site. Laboratory indicators, such as blood routine, electrolytes, arterial blood gas, liver function, and renal function, were collected within 24 hours of admission. Furthermore, the corresponding specimens were cultured for pathogenic microorganisms according to the site of infection. The LAC value was measured at admission and 24 h after admission, and the 24 h lactate clearance rate was calculated. The Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Status Score II (APACHE-II) and SOFA score were calculated, which were based on the worst value of the index within 24 hours after admission. According to the prognosis of patients during hospitalization, they are divided into two groups: (i) survival group and (ii) death group. We entered all the data into Excel and used SPSS21.0 statistical software for data analysis and processing. Quantitative data are tested for normality. Quantitative data for normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and normal distribution and uniform variance are measured. The factors affecting the prognosis of patients with sepsis were first subjected to a single-factor logistic regression analysis, and a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on the basis of the significance of the single-factor analysis. The results found that the prognosis of patients with sepsis in the ICU is affected by multiple factors such as underlying diseases, infectious microorganisms, comorbidities, and interventional therapy. APACHE-II score, 24 h lactate clearance rate, ARDS, and DIC are independent risk factors that affect the prognosis of ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.