Application value and feasibility analysis of humanistic health management for cancer screening in physical examination.

Lijin Yan, Zhiqi Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lijin YanDepartment of Physical Examination Service, Hubei Hanchuan People's Hospital Hanchuan, Hubei Province, China.

Zhiqi HuangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Hubei Hanchuan People's Hospital Hanchuan, Hubei Province, China.

Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the application value and feasibility of humanistic health management in cancer screening in physical examination.

methodsA total of 100 carcinoma patients were randomly grouped into the control group and the experimental group, with 50 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received a general physical examination, while those in the experimental group received humanistic health care management model, health education, environmental management, private nursing and emergency management. The two groups were compared in missing item rate, health knowledge score, physical examination quality, basic literacy of nursing staff, adverse events and physical examination satisfaction.

resultsThere was 1 case of missing items in the ENT (ear nose throat branch) in the experimental group, with a missing item rate of 2.00%, and 7 cases of missing items in the control group, with a missing item rate of 14.00% (χ

conclusionHumanistic health management can improve the efficiency of medical examination, the mastery of health knowledge and reduce the rate of missed examinations and adverse accidents, thus improving the overall satisfaction of patients.

Indexed as

Humanistic health managementquality of physical examinationsatisfaction with physical examinationtumor screening physical examination

Identifiers

PMID35035769

PMCPMC8748086

OpenAlexW4206870143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.