ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation on ulcerative colitis and its effect on gastrointestinal motility and immune function.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and its effect on gastrointestinal motility (GM) and immune function.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 47 UC patients. The patients were divided into an observation group (n=17, treated with FMT) and a control group (n=30, treated with conventional treatment) according to the treatment regimen. In the observation group, FMT was used to treat colonic lesions by transplanting colonic bacteria fluid from healthy people. Clinical efficacy, immune function, level of inflammatory factors and gastrointestinal function of the two groups were observed before and after treatment.
resultsThe total response rates of observation group was 94.12%, which was higher than that of control group (70.00%; P<0.05). After treatment, the contents of CD3+, CD4+ T cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were increased, while the content of CD8+ T cells was decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment (all P<0.05); and the contents of CD3+, CD4+ T cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while CD8+ T cells showed an opposite trend (P<0.05). The levels of immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M as well as interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α and motilin were lower than those before treatment in both groups (all P<0.05), and the decreases in the observation group were more significant than those in the control group (all P<0.001). After treatment, cholecystokinin and vasoactive peptide were higher than those before treatment in both groups (all P<0.05), and the increased degree in the observation group was more obvious than that in the control group (all P<0.001).
conclusionFMT has significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of UC, which may be related to the improvement of immune function, alleviation of inflammatory response and promotion of GM recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35035748PMC8748100W4206845019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.