ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Gender differences in degenerative lumbar scoliosis spine flexibilities.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a novel asymmetric force degenerative lumbar scoliosis aging bipedal rat model.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on the concept of intervertebral correction.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Effect of spinal fusion on degenerative scoliosis in elderly patients and analysis of influencing factors.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe incidence of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is higher in girls, but spine deformities are more severe in boys. We aimed to identify gender differences of mechanical factors involved in adult degenerative scoliosis (DS).
methods20 male (60.35±6.77 years) and 19 female (58.89±9.15 years) specimens of cadaveric lumbar spines were divided into 3 groups comprised of a Cobb angle >10° (DS), a Cobb angle <10° but >3° (pre-degenerative scoliosis (PS)) and intervertebral disc angles <3° in which the Cobb angle could not be measured (non-degenerative scoliosis (NS)), respectively. Spine data were collected for flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial torsion (AT), range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ) and the neutral zone ratio (NZR).
resultsThere was no significant difference regarding the severity of DS between male and female specimens. Only in males were ROM
conclusionsIn lumbar scoliosis specimens, the rigidness of spines was higher in males than in females and more pronounced in right than in left scoliosis, but only in males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35035737PMC8748112W4206866501What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.