Value of ultrasound elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and micro-flow imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.

objectiveBreast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women and shows a rising incidence at younger ages. Therefore, early diagnosis is of great significance for treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to compare the value of ultrasound elastography (UE) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and micro-flow imaging (MFI) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the breast.

methodsThe sonographic characteristics of UE and CEUS as well as the vascular characteristics of MFI of 109 breast lesions categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, confirmed by surgical or biopsy pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the three examination modalities, either alone or in combination.

resultsOf the 109 breast lesions, 78 lesions were pathologically diagnosed as malignant and 31 as benign. At diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of UE were 0.8495, 65.38%, 83.87% and 83.34%, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MFI were 86.29%, 70.51%, 87.10% and 85.56%, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS were 90.84%, 88.46%, 74.19% and 89.16%, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combined diagnosis of UE, MFI, and CEUS were 93.90%, 85.90%, 90.32%, and 92.07%, respectively.

conclusionsThe combination of UE, CEUS and MFI has the highest specificity and accuracy in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions compared to any one used singly.