Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035734›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

CalliSpheres

Song Liu, Guangji Yu, Qingdong Wang, Long Li, Ying Liu, Ke Du, Fei Zhang, Bangli Zhao, Guangsheng Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Song LiuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Guangji YuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Qingdong WangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Long LiDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Ying LiuHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Beijing, China.
Ke DuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Fei ZhangDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Bangli ZhaoDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Linyi Cancer Hospital Linyi, China.
Guangsheng ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University Dalian, China.
Linyi People's Hospital · CNAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the clinical efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres

methodThe study retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with large liver cancer. 42 patients who received DEB-TACE and sorafenib were included in the experimental group and 48 patients who received only DEB-TACE were included in the control group. The efficacy, TTP, OS and ARs were evaluated and further analysis was conducted on factors which might affect the prognosis.

resultsAs of June 2020. The median OS of the experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group (18.6 months vs. 12.7 months), and the TTP was also longer in the experimental group (8.3 months vs. 6.9 months). Three months after the intervention, the ORR and DCR of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. The main ARs of the experimental group taking sorafenib included hand-foot syndrome, skin rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, and anorexia. And they could be alleviated through treatment of the symptoms. TACE-related ARs for both groups were fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting, and there was no significant difference. Logistic regression analysis showed that the combined sorafenib treatment was a protective factor improving the prognosis of patients with large liver cancer, and risk factors were the number of tumors and vascular invasion.

conclusionDEB-TACE combined with sorafenib is safe and well tolerated in the treatment of large liver cancer. It can improve the tumor control rate and prolong the survival time.

Indexed as

drug-eluting bead microsphereshepatocellular carcinomasorafenibTranscatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID35035734
PMCPMC8748101
OpenAlexW4206878652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.