ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Long-term follow-up of diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Heterogeneous Syndrome with Evolving Management-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Impact of diabetes and ejection fraction on non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction outcomes.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Outcomes Between ST-Segment Elevation and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Characteristics of calcified nodule attributable to culprit lesion in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2024Article
- Review
- Observational
- Survival of Myocardial Infarction Patients with Diabetes Mellitus at the Invasive Era (Results from the Városmajor Myocardial Infarction Registry).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The value of PRECISE-DAPT score and lesion complexity for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with NSTEMI.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNon-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is prevalent in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The long-term follow-up outcomes of this group of patients remain misunderstood. This study was aimed at investigating long-term follow-up outcomes of diabetic patients discharged with NSTEMI.
methodsAll diabetic patients discharged with MI were recruited and followed up in this study. Patients who had elevated serum troponin, but no ST segment elevation were considered as NSTEMI. A structured follow-up was conducted at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Independent risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed.
resultsA total of 743 diabetic patients with MI enrolled for analysis, with 132 patients being recognized as NSTEMI. The mean age was 70.4±8.3 years. The mean follow-up was 21.3±6.1 months. NSTEMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.23), age ≥75 years (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31), hypertension (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03-2.21), heart failure (HF) (HR 3.23, 95% CI 2.28-4.57), and previous MI (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.44-2.79) were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality. Administration of beta-blocker (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85) was associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality. Predictors for cardiovascular mortality included elderly, hypertension, HF, previous MI, and MI with atypical chest pain.
conclusionsMultiple risk factors contribute to a higher incidence of composite outcomes in diabetic patients with MI. STEMI poses a greater threat to adverse events, which warrants more investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35035727PMC8748141W4206877629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.