ArticleProcedia computer science2022
A Micro-analysis Approach in Understanding Electronic Medical Record Usage in Rural Communities: Comparison of Frequency of Use on Performance Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Procedia computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of health information systems capacity among China and Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries based on the World Health Organization SCORE assessment tool.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Analyzing Physician In Basket Burden and Efficiency Using K-Means Clustering.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Towards Integrated and Quality-assured Health Service Delivery: Making a Case for Health Smart Card in the Philippines.Acta medica Philippina · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In strengthening eHealth in the Philippines to support the universal health care (UHC) law, the scaling up and full adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) systems was strategically scheduled and supposedly completed in 2020. The Covid-19 pandemic, however, delayed these strengthening efforts. We wanted to assess the status of EMR adoption in primary clinics of rural health units (RHUs) and understand the frequency of use, particularly during the pandemic. Through analyses of EMR usage logs from selected RHUs in 2020, we estimated frequency of EMR usage based on duration of use and tested if this was influenced by the performing RHU and pandemic event. We also determined the most frequent EMR activities through process maps and tested if there were differences in the conduct of these activities before and during the pandemic. Results showed that EMR use during work hours was significantly dependent on the performing RHU (p<0.001). High-performing RHUs used EMRs more than 3 hours/day while low-performing RHUs used the systems for less. The pandemic either significantly decreased or increased EMR use during work hours by around 5 hours/day in some RHUs (p<0.01). Process maps revealed that there were additional activities performed by RHUs during the pandemic. Except for Update Patient Profile and Add Patient EMR features, significant differences (p<0.01) were observed in accessing frequently used features before and during the pandemic. The results suggest some uneven level of utilization of EMRs at the primary care level which can impact readiness to support full implementation of the UHC law. The study shows the potential of using a more granular approach in studying adoption to help improve the quality of EMR use and contribute to improving health service delivery and financing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.