Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035593›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2021

The energetic barrier to single-file water flow through narrow channels.

Juergen Pfeffermann, Nikolaus Goessweiner-Mohr, Peter Pohl

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Water will Find Its Way: Transport through Narrow Tunnels in Hydrolases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biophysical reviews · 2021
    Article
  9. Translational Biophysics - 20Biophysical reviews · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juergen PfeffermannInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-6101
Nikolaus Goessweiner-MohrInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6572-5606
Peter PohlInstitute of Biophysics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-2314
Johannes Kepler University of Linz · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various nanoscopic channels of roughly equal diameter and length facilitate single-file diffusion at vastly different rates. The underlying variance of the energetic barriers to transport is poorly understood. First, water partitioning into channels so narrow that individual molecules cannot overtake each other incurs an energetic penalty. Corresponding estimates vary widely depending on how the sacrifice of two out of four hydrogen bonds is accounted for. Second, entropy differences between luminal and bulk water may arise: additional degrees of freedom caused by dangling OH-bonds increase entropy. At the same time, long-range dipolar water interactions decrease entropy. Here, we dissect different contributions to Gibbs free energy of activation, Δ

Indexed as

Activation energyConfined geometryEntropy and enthalpyHydrogen bondingPermeabilityTransition state theory

Identifiers

PMID35035593
PMCPMC8724168
OpenAlexW3216803900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.