Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035559›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2021

Management of children and adolescents with bronchiectasis: summary of the ERS clinical practice guideline.

Anne B Chang, Keith Grimwood, Jeanette Boyd, Rebecca Fortescue, Zena Powell, Ahmad Kantar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bronchiectasis in children: a systematic review of cytokine profile, immune cell phenotypes and microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne B ChangAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-3706
Keith GrimwoodDepts of Infectious Disease and Paediatrics, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Australia.
Jeanette BoydEuropean Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK.
Rebecca FortescuePopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Zena PowellEuropean Lung Foundation bronchiectasis paediatric patient advisory group, Sheffield, UK.
Ahmad KantarPediatric Asthma and Cough Centre, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi, University and Research Hospitals, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3445-4612
British Lung Foundation · GBGriffith University · AUIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITQueensland University of Technology · AUSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchiectasis, characterised by chronic wet/productive cough with recurrent respiratory exacerbations and abnormal bronchial dilatation on computed tomography scans, remains an increasingly recognised but often neglected chronic pulmonary disorder in children and adolescents. An early diagnosis combined with optimal management offers the prospect, at least in some patients, of curing a condition previously considered irreversible. However, unlike in adults, until now no international paediatric guidelines existed. The recently published European Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of children and adolescents with bronchiectasis attempts to address this clinical information gap. The guidelines were formulated by panel members comprised of experts from several relevant health fields, the European Lung Foundation and parents of children with bronchiectasis. Systematic reviews and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach guided the nature and strength of recommendations. The recommendations are grouped into clinically relevant topics: diagnosis, evaluating for underlying causes, defining exacerbations, management, systematic care, monitoring, reversibility and prevention. The guidelines seek to achieve: 1) optimal lung growth, 2) preserved lung function, 3) enhanced quality of life, 4) minimal exacerbations, 5) few or no complications, and 6) if possible, reversal of lung injury for each child/adolescent with bronchiectasis. This review presents example cases that highlight the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines. EDUCATIONAL

aimsThis article is intended for those involved in caring for children/adolescents with bronchiectasis. It aims to inform:Clinicians of the European Respiratory Society recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children/adolescents with bronchiectasis.Adolescents and parents of children/adolescents with bronchiectasis of these recommendations, so as to assist discussions with healthcare teams and help facilitate access to appropriate care.

Identifiers

PMID35035559
PMCPMC8753694
OpenAlexW3202012765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.