Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035339›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental chemistry letters2022

Metal-organic frameworks for active food packaging. A review.

Afreen Sultana, Ajay Kathuria, Kirtiraj K Gaikwad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental chemistry letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Efficient Preservation of Perishable Fruits by Erasable Metal-Organic Frameworks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Magnetically recoverable FeScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Functionality Enhancement of Pullulan-Based Composites for Food Packaging Applications.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. The Immunostimulatory Effect of MIL-101(Al)-NHInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Afreen SultanaDepartment of Paper Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667 India.
Ajay KathuriaIndustrial of Technology and Packaging, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
Kirtiraj K GaikwadDepartment of Paper Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667 India.ORCID 0000-0002-2543-0192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food wastage is a major concern for sustainable health and agriculture. To reduce food waste, classical preservation techniques such as drying, pasteurization, freeze-drying, fermentation, and microwave are available. Nonetheless, these techniques display shortcomings such as alteration of food and taste. Such shortcomings may be solved by active food packaging, which involves the incorporation of active agents into the packaging material. Recently, metal-organic frameworks, a class of porous hybrid supramolecular materials, have been developed as an active agent to extend food shelf life and maintain safety. Here, we review metal-organic frameworks in active packaging as oxygen scavengers, antimicrobials, moisture absorbers, and ethylene scavengers. We present methods of incorporation of metal-organic frameworks into packaging materials and their applications.

Indexed as

AbsorberAntimicrobialFood packagingFood safetyMetal–organic frameworksScavenger

Identifiers

PMID35035339
PMCPMC8748186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.