ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Tailored patient self-management and supervised, home-based, pulmonary rehabilitation for mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Current Status, Challenges, and Optimization Strategies for Self-Management in Patients with COPD: A Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Our study aimed to estimate the effects of a supervised, intensive, home-based-pulmonary-rehabilitation (HBPR) program for mild and moderate chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD) patients. [Participants and Methods] A retrospective, case-control study. Forty-three (N=43) patients were observed, divided into Treatment-Group (TG) and Control-Group (CG). The TG (N=23) underwent a 4-week training program, consisting of endurance and strength training sessions, performed 4-times per week. In addition, inspiration muscle training was performed, with a threshold device. The primary outcome was dyspnea improvements, measured by the modified-Borg-scale (mBS), and the secondary outcome was the determination of diaphragm excursion and function, using ultrasound (US) assessment to measure clinical parameters. [Results] The results suggested significantly improved mBS scores, measured for the ΔT0-T1 and ΔT0-T2 time points; improved diaphragm-excursion (Dia-Ex) at ΔT0-T1 and ΔT0-T2; and improved maximum Dia-Ex at ΔT0-T1 and ΔT1-T2 in the TG compared with the CG. Moreover, the results showed improvements over time for all parameters in the TG versus CG, suggesting a constant improvement in respiratory pathology. [Conclusion] A supervised HBPR plan was effective in reducing dyspnea by the mBS, and improving diaphragmatic function, as determined by US evaluation, and lastly improving quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.