ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Characteristics of gaze tracking during movement analysis by therapists.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experience-related differences in eye movement characteristics during supervised walking and stair negotiation in physical therapists.Journal of physical therapy science · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Visual assessment of the quality of movement is a common and important component of physiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to quantify the level of proficiency of therapists and to obtain a new index of proficiency by measuring the coordinates of the gaze tracking trajectories of therapists with years of experience. [Participants and Methods] Eighteen voluntary physiotherapists (1st year (n=4), 7th year (n=1), 9th year (n=4), 10th year (n=3), 11th year (n=4), 13th year (n=1), and 21st year (n=1)) were recruited for this study. [Results] Discriminant analysis according to the size of the deviation between the X-axis and Y-axis of the range of gaze tracking during movement analysis measured from each therapist showed that the percentage of classification accuracy in the 10th year or less was 72.2%. Cluster analysis showed that two clusters were formed. Thirteen therapists in Cluster 2 were in their 9th year or more. Eye tracking trajectories can be classified by the 10th year of experience as a therapist. [Conclusion] It was shown that full-fledged therapists with 10 years of experience also expanded the range of eye tracking. The trajectory in the Y-axis direction tends to be extended with their 9th year or more of experience. In this point, quantitative judgments of eye-tracking results can serve as indicators of proficiency. The eye movements are important as a tool to objectively measure skills from experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.