ArticleCities (London, England)2022
Household mobility in food purchasing during COVID-19 lockdown: Evidence from Torino, Italy.
Article in Cities (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can digitalization improve the equality and equity of food environment? Evidence from greengrocers in central Shanghai.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- A study on the factors that influenced the choice of transport mode before, during, and after the first lockdown in Milan, Italy.Cities (London, England) · 2023Article
- Changes to household food shopping practices during the COVID-19 restrictions: Evidence from the East of England.Health & place · 2022Article
- Analysis of the impact of non-compulsory measures on human mobility in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.Cities (London, England) · 2022Article
- Food Acquisition during the COVID-19 Lockdown and Its Associations with the Physical-Digital Integrated Community Food Environment: A Case Study of Nanjing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Food spending in the United States during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the first wave of COVID-19, lockdown restrictions limited people's movements mainly to food purchasing. Using survey data collected in Torino, Italy, from university students, this study analyses the lockdown's impact on the transportation means used for purchasing food compared to the pre-lockdown period. Food store businesses were not limited by the restrictions and people had to purchase food; however, national and local rules limited citizens' movements, potentially leading to a different choices of transportation means than before the pandemic. The results show that both the lockdown and, perhaps, the fear of contagion, moved the preferences of people from public and shared means to foot and private vehicles. These findings can help in rethinking how transportation is organised in an urban environment, such as that in Torino. Ensuring the safety of public and shared transportation may help sustain mobility during health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.