Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034949›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor basic research2022

Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Enhances Motor Response Inhibition and Visual Recognition Memory.

Shahid Bashir, Azzam Bamugaddam, Muath Alasheikh, Tariq Alhassan, Saud Alhaidar, Abdulelah Khalaf Almutairi, Mohammed Alfaleh, Khalid Al-Regaiey, Sultan S Al Zahrani, Bassam Ali Albaiji and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor basic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shahid BashirNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-6895
Azzam BamugaddamCollege of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muath AlasheikhDepartment of Surgery, Prince Mohammed Ibn Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq AlhassanDepartment of Pediatrics, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saud AlhaidarDepartment of Family Medicine & Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulelah Khalaf AlmutairiMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlfalehCollege of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-114X
Khalid Al-RegaieyDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-5637
Sultan S Al ZahraniNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Bassam Ali AlbaijiNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Turki AbualaitCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahad Specialist Hospital · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAKing Saud University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAMinistry of Health · SAPrince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain modulatory technique that can boost cognitive processes and alter performance in cognitive tasks. The effect of anodal-tDCS on cognitive functions following a single session has been repeatedly reported. However, results are varied, mixed, and confounded by several factors, including differences in tDCS current intensity and sham conditions used. Therefore, we assessed the effect of a single session of anodal-tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) on cognitive functions, particularly response inhibitory control and visual recognition memory, in healthy adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty healthy male subjects participated in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled tDCS study (2 mA, for 20 min). In the sham stimulation, subjects received the same intensity (2 mA, for 30 s, ramped up, then ramped down). We assessed the cognitive functions response inhibitory control and visual recognition memory using the stop signal task (SST) and pattern recognition memory (PRM) task before and after the stimulation. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference in cognitive function as assessed by the stop signal task go trial (SST) (P=0.019) and SST correct response time on go trials (P=0.04) after real stimulation only. There was no significant effect observed in sham condition. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that anodal-tDCS applied over M1 improves inhibitory control and visual recognition memory compared to sham stimulation. Thus, application of anodal-tDCS to the M1, as an integral node in inhibitory motor control, might be a promising adjuvant therapeutic intervention for modulation of motor response inhibition.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCognitionHumansMaleMemoryReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID35034949
PMCPMC8779998
OpenAlexW4206128250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.