Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034722›Full record

ReviewAdvances in protein chemistry and structural biology2022

Development of enhanced conformational sampling methods to probe the activation landscape of GPCRs.

Ravinder Abrol, Erik Serrano, Luis Jaimes Santiago

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ravinder AbrolDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Northridge, CA, United States. Electronic address: abrol@csun.edu.
Erik SerranoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Northridge, CA, United States.
Luis Jaimes SantiagoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Northridge, CA, United States.
California State University, Northridge · US

Funding

BUILD PODER IITL4GM118977 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE · PI CHAVIRA, GABRIELA, KHACHIKIAN, CRIST SIMON · 2015 to 2023
$18.1M
BUILD PODER IIRL5GM118975 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE · PI CHAVIRA, GABRIELA, KHACHIKIAN, CRIST SIMON · 2015 to 2023
$10.7M
RISE@CSUN: Preparing Students for Careers in Basic Biomedical SciencesR25GM063787 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE · PI ZAVALA, MARIAELENA B · 2001 to 2018
$9.2M
Probing the Structural Basis of Innate G Protein Specificity in G Protein-Coupled Receptor SignalingSC2GM130480 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE · PI ABROL, RAVINDER · 2020 to 2022
$435k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM063787NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118975NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM130480NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) make up the largest superfamily of integral membrane proteins and play critical signal transduction roles in many physiological processes. Developments in molecular biology, biophysical, biochemical, pharmacological, and computational techniques aimed at these important therapeutic targets are beginning to provide unprecedented details on the structural as well as functional basis of their pleiotropic signaling mediated by G proteins, β arrestins, and other transducers. This pleiotropy presents a pharmacological challenge as the same ligand-receptor interaction can cause a therapeutic effect as well as an undesirable on-target side-effect through different downstream pathways. GPCRs don't function as simple binary on-off switches but as finely tuned shape-shifting machines described by conformational ensembles, where unique subsets of conformations may be responsible for specific signaling cascades. X-ray crystallography and more recently cryo-electron microscopy are providing snapshots of some of these functionally-important receptor conformations bound to ligands and/or transducers, which are being utilized by computational methods to describe the dynamic conformational energy landscape of GPCRs. In this chapter, we review the progress in computational conformational sampling methods based on molecular dynamics and discrete sampling approaches that have been successful in complementing biophysical and biochemical studies on these receptors in terms of their activation mechanisms, allosteric effects, actions of biased ligands, and effects of pathological mutations. Some of the sampled simulation time scales are beginning to approach receptor activation time scales. The list of conformational sampling methods and example uses discussed is not exhaustive but includes representative examples that have pushed the limits of classical molecular dynamics and discrete sampling methods to describe the activation energy landscape of GPCRs.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledCryoelectron MicroscopyLigandsProtein ConformationLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAdaptively-biasedBiased signalingComputational methodsConformational samplingFunctional selectivityGPCR activationMarkov state modelsMetadynamicsMolecular dynamicsStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID35034722
PMCPMC11476118
OpenAlexW4205612718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.