ArticleBMC oral health2022
Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of clinician experience on the accuracy of static guided implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a cadaver study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- A Real-Time Inertial Sensor-Based Diagnostic Support System for Improving Angular Accuracy in Dental Implant Placement: Preclinical Experimental Validation in a 3D Haptic Simulation Model.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Comparison of the accuracy between guided and freehand placement of periorbital implants-a cadaveric split-face study.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Objective Evaluation of the Changes in the Alveolar Ridge Before and After Horizontal Bone Augmentation Along with Implant Placement Using Intraoral Digital Scanning: A Prospective Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Alveolar ridge augmentation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: a study on current practices, patient management and innovations in Germany.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional digital imaging analysis of the palatal bone thickness for orthodontic mini-implant insertion - determination of the safe zone and angulation.BMC oral health · 2024Observational
- Passive fit and time efficiency for prefabricated versus conventionally constructed cobalt chromium CAD\CAM 3-unit implant supported frameworks in free end saddle models: a pilot invitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Article
- Full-Arch Guided Restoration and Bone Regeneration: A Complete Digital Workflow Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Modeling (CAD/CAM) for Guiding Dental Implant Surgery: Personal Reflection Based on 10 Years of Real-Life Experience.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Risk of root damage after using lateral cephalogram and intraoral scan for guided insertion of palatal miniscrews.Head & face medicine · 2022Article
- Quality assurance and long-term stability of a novel 3-in-1 X-ray system for brachytherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Review
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following flap and flapless implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of virtual planning of computer-guided surgery based on the actual outcomes of clinical dental implant placement.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients among whom implant treatment was planned using computer-guided surgery with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The patients who received implant according to the guide with the flapless and flapped approach were classified as group 1 and 2, respectively, and the others who could not be placed according to the guide were allocated to the drop-out group. The accuracy of implant placement was evaluated with the superimposition of CBCT.
resultsWe analyzed differences in the deviated distance of the entrance point and deviated angulation of the insertion of implant fixtures. With regard to the surgical approach, group 2 exhibited greater accuracy compared to group 1 in deviation distance (2.22 ± 0.88 and 3.18 ± 0.89 mm, respectively, P < 0.001) and angulation (4.27 ± 2.30 and 6.82 ± 2.71°, respectively, P = 0.001). The limitations of guided surgery were discussed while considering the findings from the drop-out group.
conclusionsComputer-guided surgery demonstrates greater accuracy in implant placement with the flapless approach. Further research should be conducted to enhance the availability of guides for cases with unfavorable residual bone conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.