Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034422›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Valued attributes of professional support for people who repeatedly self-harm: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of first-hand accounts.

Cara Sass, Cathy Brennan, Kate Farley, Helen Crosby, Rocio Rodriguez Lopez, Daniel Romeu, Elizabeth Mitchell, Allan House, Else Guthrie

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cara SassLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-903X
Cathy BrennanLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-8497
Kate FarleyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-9065
Helen CrosbyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-0606
Rocio Rodriguez LopezLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-8128
Daniel RomeuLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-0202
Elizabeth MitchellSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Allan HouseLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-8026
Else GuthrieLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-6616
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic interventions are an important adjunct to self-help strategies for people who self-harm. There is little guidance for those offering therapy on the effective components of interventions for people who self-harm. This was a systematic review aiming to identify the factors that contribute to positive experiences of therapy as described by people who have reduced or stopped self-harm. The review followed PRISMA guidelines to locate and synthesize peer-reviewed qualitative studies describing experiences of therapy among people who had reduced or stopped self-harm. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were peer reviewed and conducted for at least two researchers independently. Relevant first-hand quotations were extracted from eligible studies and synthesized using a thematic analysis in collaboration with experts with personal and professional experience of self-harm. Twenty-three studies met eligibility criteria. Themes identified in the reported accounts were arranged under two meta-themes. 'Positive aspects of seeing a professional' identified aspects of professional care that were common to all encounters: the value of sharing, space to talk and reflect, and the boundaries inherent in contact with a professional. 'Positive attributes of individual professionals' depended upon individual characteristics: the ability to build reciprocal trust by being non-judgemental, showing genuine empathic concern, and being confident to talk about and respond directly to self-harm. Our review indicates that therapeutic alliance is perceived as key to effective professional help for self-harm, irrespective of underlying principles of therapy. All forms of therapy should be timely and reliable and centred around the needs of the individual and their experience of self-harm.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorHumansQualitative Researchpsychotherapyqualitative researchself-harmself-injurious behavioursystematic reviewtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35034422
PMCPMC9306637
OpenAlexW4205776622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.