Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034310›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Management of Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Novel Combination Therapies in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany.

H Tilman Steinmetz, Moushmi Singh, Joseph Milce, Mohamad Haidar, Achim Rieth, Andrea Lebioda, Jörn Kohnke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

H Tilman SteinmetzCenter for Hematology and Oncology, Oncology Cologne, Sachsenring 69, 50677, Cologne, Germany. steinmetz@oncokoeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-3109
Moushmi SinghAmgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
Joseph MilceKantar Health, Paris, France.
Mohamad HaidarKantar Health, Paris, France.
Achim RiethAmgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Andrea LebiodaAmgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Jörn KohnkeOnkologie Zentrum Sud, Remscheid, Germany.
Amgen (Germany) · DEAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBIntegrated Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultiple myeloma remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy which, despite improvements in overall survival over the last decade, is characterized by recurrent relapse and is associated with a poor prognosis. This study investigates the use of novel agents in current real-world clinical practice in the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Germany over different lines of therapy.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with RRMM treated at multiple centers across Germany between May 2017 and June 2018. Variables included patient demographics and clinical characteristics, current and prior treatment regimens, treatment response, cytogenetic abnormalities, testing methodology, and resource utilization.

resultsData were analyzed from 484 patients from 47 centers across Germany (60% male; average age over 70 years; majority at International Staging System stage 2 or 3). Bone pain and anemia were the most common symptoms at diagnosis, with 63% of patients receiving osteoprotective drugs. Approximately one-third (32%) of patients had received autologous stem cell transplantation and approximately 70% underwent cytogenetic testing. After failure to respond to first-line treatment, most patients received regimens containing second-generation proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, with overall response rates greater than 90% in second line (95% and 90% for daratumumab-based and carfilzomib-based therapies, respectively). The incidence of unplanned hospitalization ranged from 11% to 16% across all treatment lines, with longer hospital stays required for treatment administration than for treatment-related toxicity.

conclusionAlthough treatment patterns for RRMM in Germany differ by line of therapy and are adapted as disease progresses, patients mostly receive combination regimens with carfilzomib or daratumumab in second and third lines, with high overall response rates achieved in all lines.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousCarfilzomibDaratumumabGermanyMonoclonal antibodyProteasome inhibitorReal-worldRecurrent/refractory multiple myelomaTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID35034310
PMCPMC8918129
OpenAlexW4205598211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.