ArticleAdvances in therapy2022
Management of Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Novel Combination Therapies in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lenalidomide-based triplet regimens in first relapsed multiple myeloma patients: real-world evidence from a propensity score matched analysis.Haematologica · 2023Pooled it
- Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Therapeutic Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Patients (CharisMMa Study) with Symptomatic Relapse and/or Refractory Disease: An Observational, Multicenter Study in Portugal.Hematology reports · 2026Article
- Prospective systematic classification of causes of death in the course of multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Treatment Patterns, Goals, and Decision-Making Criteria for Second- and Third-Line Therapies for Multiple Myeloma in Germany.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Treatment pattern and outcomes of re-induction therapy prior to stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Germany.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Estimation of eligibility for and response to CAR-T therapy in the United States.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Real-world experience of novel multiple myeloma treatments in a large, single-center cohort in Finland.EJHaem · 2023Article
- Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Hotspots and trends in multiple myeloma bone diseases: A bibliometric visualization analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple myeloma remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy which, despite improvements in overall survival over the last decade, is characterized by recurrent relapse and is associated with a poor prognosis. This study investigates the use of novel agents in current real-world clinical practice in the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Germany over different lines of therapy.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with RRMM treated at multiple centers across Germany between May 2017 and June 2018. Variables included patient demographics and clinical characteristics, current and prior treatment regimens, treatment response, cytogenetic abnormalities, testing methodology, and resource utilization.
resultsData were analyzed from 484 patients from 47 centers across Germany (60% male; average age over 70 years; majority at International Staging System stage 2 or 3). Bone pain and anemia were the most common symptoms at diagnosis, with 63% of patients receiving osteoprotective drugs. Approximately one-third (32%) of patients had received autologous stem cell transplantation and approximately 70% underwent cytogenetic testing. After failure to respond to first-line treatment, most patients received regimens containing second-generation proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, with overall response rates greater than 90% in second line (95% and 90% for daratumumab-based and carfilzomib-based therapies, respectively). The incidence of unplanned hospitalization ranged from 11% to 16% across all treatment lines, with longer hospital stays required for treatment administration than for treatment-related toxicity.
conclusionAlthough treatment patterns for RRMM in Germany differ by line of therapy and are adapted as disease progresses, patients mostly receive combination regimens with carfilzomib or daratumumab in second and third lines, with high overall response rates achieved in all lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.