Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034278›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2022

Do Community-based Livelihood Interventions Affect Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Young People in Slum Areas of Uganda: a Difference-in-difference with Kernel Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Andre M N Renzaho, Joseph K Kamara, Daniel Doh, Paul Bukuluki, Rashidul A Mahumud, Moses Galukande

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andre M N RenzahoSchool of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-0833
Joseph K KamaraSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3151, Australia. joseph.kamara@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-9611
Daniel DohSchool of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7352-6121
Paul BukulukiDepartment of Social World and Social Administration, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-5469
Rashidul A MahumudNHMRC Clinical Trial Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9788-1868
Moses GalukandeCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-968X
Makerere University · UGThe University of Sydney · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AUWorld Vision · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slum dwellers across Africa have been targeted in interventions whose impacts remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of a livelihood intervention on the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of young people in the slum areas of Kampala, Uganda. We carried out a repeated cross-sectional survey in 2014 and 2017 to examine the impact of community-based livelihood interventions on the SRHR of young people in the slum areas of Kampala, Uganda. Impacts were observed such as reduced sexual activity, reduction in aspects of gender-based violence attitudes and beliefs, increased access to and decision-making about contraceptive and family-planning services, increased availability and affordability of SRHR services, reduced need to seek further knowledge on SRHR, reduced barriers to HIV testing, and increased knowledge of health responsibilities. Unexpected results included: increased proportion of young people who had ever had sex, decreased mean age of sexual debut, unaffordability of contraceptives, and increased culturally shaped attitudes and social norms related to gender-based violence. We observed no impact on condom use, consensual sex and sexual assault, the number of sexual partners, knowledge about HIV/AIDS, stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV/AIDS, affordability of male and female condoms, and uptake of HIV testing services. Rights-based interventions are crucial to how we understand the SRHR of young people in complex sociocultural environments. While the livelihood interventions made significant impacts on the SRHR of young people, there are questions about how such interventions address deeply rooted sociocultural practices to maximise outcomes.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsReproductive HealthAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePoverty AreasPropensity ScoreSexual BehaviorUgandaHuman rightsLivelihoodsReproductive healthSexual healthSlumsYoung people

Identifiers

PMID35034278
PMCPMC8866584
OpenAlexW4206816789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.