Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034243›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Racial differences in breast cancer outcomes by hepatocyte growth factor pathway expression.

Gieira S Jones, Katherine A Hoadley, Halei Benefield, Linnea T Olsson, Alina M Hamilton, Arjun Bhattacharya, Erin L Kirk, Heather J Tipaldos, Jodie M Fleming, Kevin P Williams and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gieira S JonesDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-6470
Katherine A HoadleyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Halei BenefieldDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.
Linnea T OlssonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.
Alina M HamiltonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Arjun BhattacharyaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Erin L KirkDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.
Heather J TipaldosLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Jodie M FlemingLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Kevin P WilliamsBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, USA.
Michael I LoveDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA.
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 253 Rosenau Hall, CB #7435, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA. troester@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina Central University · USQB3 · US

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Reproduction, Lactation and Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer SubtypesP01CA151135 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2017
$18.1M
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA151135NCI NIH HHS P01CA151135NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS P50-CA58223NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlack women have a 40% increased risk of breast cancer-related mortality. These outcome disparities may reflect differences in tumor pathways and a lack of targetable therapies for specific subtypes that are more common in Black women. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a targetable pathway that promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis, is associated with basal-like breast cancer, and is differentially expressed by race. This study assessed whether a 38-gene HGF expression signature is associated with recurrence and survival in Black and non-Black women.

methodsStudy participants included 1957 invasive breast cancer cases from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. The HGF signature was evaluated in association with recurrence (n = 1251, 171 recurrences), overall, and breast cancer-specific mortality (n = 706, 190/328 breast cancer/overall deaths) using Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsWomen with HGF-positive tumors had higher recurrence rates [HR 1.88, 95% CI (1.19, 2.98)], breast cancer-specific mortality [HR 1.90, 95% CI (1.26, 2.85)], and overall mortality [HR 1.69; 95% CI (1.17, 2.43)]. Among Black women, HGF positivity was significantly associated with higher 5-year rate of recurrence [HR 1.73; 95% CI (1.01, 2.99)], but this association was not significant in non-Black women [HR 1.68; 95% CI (0.72, 3.90)]. Among Black women, HGF-positive tumors had elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [HR 1.80, 95% CI (1.05, 3.09)], which was not significant in non-Black women [HR 1.52; 95% CI (0.78, 2.99)].

conclusionThis multi-gene HGF signature is a poor-prognosis feature for breast cancer and may identify patients who could benefit from HGF-targeted treatments, an unmet need for Black and triple-negative patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHepatocyte Growth FactorBlack PeopleFemaleHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRace FactorsWhite PeopleHepatocyte Growth FactorHGF protein, humanBreast cancerHepatocyte growth factor

Identifiers

PMID35034243
PMCPMC9380654
OpenAlexW4206108085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.