Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35034189›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Marital status and survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a multinomial propensity scores matched study.

Xiushuai Du, Wenqiang Zhan, Xiaoqin Li, Shuo Yin, Qingquan Chen, Jialing Huang, Yao Chen, Jin Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiushuai Du *Department of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Wenqiang Zhan *School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqin LiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Shuo YinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Qingquan ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jialing HuangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yao ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jin LiuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xueyuan Road No. 1, Minhou County, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, People's Republic of China. liujin@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-1638
Fujian Medical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the correlation between the marital status and prognosis of patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). STUDY

designMPSM was adopted to minimize the maximum standardized average difference of the covariates among the four groups with different marital status.

settingMultinomial propensity scores matching (MPSM) based on data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.

methodsThe Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare the survival outcomes of these groups with different marital status.

resultsTotally, 16,981 LSCC patients (median [IQR] age 62 [55-69] years; 829 [76.41%] males) from 2004 to 2016 were included in this study. Among them, 9112 (53.66%) were married, 2708 (15.95%) divorced or separated, 1709 (10.06%) widowed, and 3452 (20.33%) single. After MPSM, the weights make the characteristics of four groups with different marital status sufficient balance. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test showed widowed patients may lead to the highest mortality rate while married patients have a higher survival rate than the other three groups. Single and divorced or separated patients had no significant difference in the survival rate. In addition, multivariate analysis by controlling for confounding factors showed that in male, well-differentiated, and early stage patients, compared with married, unmarried was an independent risk factor for CSS (P < 0.05).

conclusionMarital status showed a significant association with the survival status of LSCC patients. Importantly, the outcome of married patients was better, while widowed patients tended to have worse prognosis.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMarital StatusMiddle AgedPrognosisPropensity ScoreSEER ProgramSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckLaryngeal squamous cell carcinomaMarriageMultinomial propensity scores matchingSEER

Identifiers

PMID35034189
OpenAlexW4205184514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.