ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022
Quantitative Evaluation of Nasolabial Fold by Three-Dimensional Imaging: A Comparison with WSRS Score.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Restylane Lyft for Nonsurgical Full Nose Correction in Chinese Patients: A Retrospective 3-Dimensional Imaging-Based Cohort Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Morphometric effectiveness of calcium hydroxylapatite application in zygomatic and malar area on correction of nasolabial folds.Medicine · 2025Observational
- The Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment Protocol: Nasolabial Fold Assessment, Strategy, and Treatment With Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Chinese Patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNasolabial fold (NLF) reveals the aging of the face, and various treatments for NLF have been developed currently. However, most methods introduced to evaluate NLF are subjective and qualitative.
objectivesThis study was aimed to establish and validate a quantitative evaluation method by three-dimensional imaging, and thus accordingly to determine the relationship between quantitative measurements and wrinkle severity rating scale (WSRS) score.
methodsSeventy-five Asian female volunteers were enrolled for evaluating the severity of NLF based on both WSRS score and three-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional imaging was used to collect the quantitative measurements of NLF, including length, width, and depth. The relationship between multiple WSRS scores and quantitative measurements was compared statistically. Besides, thirty patients with moderate or severe NLF were admitted to receive hyaluronic acid injection for NLF correction. All NLFs were evaluated quantitatively pre-injection and 3 months post-injection.
resultsThe results revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between the WSRS score and the length, width, and depth of NLF, respectively. After 3 months of hyaluronic acid injection, the mean WSRS score, the length, width, and depth of NLF were significantly reduced.
conclusionsThree-dimensional imaging can be used to quantitatively assess the severity of the nasolabial folds, compensating for the deficiencies of traditional scales. This technique may help improve rejuvenation procedures for the aging nasolabial fold. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
35034152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.