Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35033169›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Blood flow restriction with different load levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Roger Andrey Carvalho Jardim, Tamara Silva de Sousa, Wueyla Nicoly Nascimento Dos Santos, Areolino Pena Matos, Natália Camargo Rodrigues Iosimuta

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roger Andrey Carvalho JardimPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Amapá - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP, Brazil. rogerandcarv@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-9861
Tamara Silva de SousaPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Amapá - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
Wueyla Nicoly Nascimento Dos SantosPhysical Therapy Course, Department of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Amapá - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
Areolino Pena MatosPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Amapá - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
Natália Camargo Rodrigues IosimutaPostgraduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Amapá - UNIFAP, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Amapá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of blood flow restriction training (BFR) in elderly with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is comparable to performing high-intensity protocols (70 to 80% of 1 RM [repetition maximum]) that are known to be effective for improving the muscle strength of knee extensors, with the advantage of generating less particular rating of perceived exertion and pain immediately after training. However, despite being a promising alternative, little is known about the best way to apply the BFR, such as level of pressure and combination or not with other therapeutic modalities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether different levels of blood flow restriction with low load (BFR + LL) and no load (BFR + rest) are non-inferior to high-intensity resistance exercise (HIRE+BFRplacebo) for pain reduction in patients with knee OA. METHODS/

designThis clinical trial is a non-inferiority, five-arm, randomized, active-controlled, single trial which will be carried out in 165 patients of both sexes with knee OA, aged 50 years and older. Participants will be randomly allocated into 5 exercise groups (40% of BFR + LL; 80% of BFR + LL; 40% of BFR + rest; 80% BFR + rest, and HIRE+BFR placebo). A mixed linear model will be used to examine the effect of group-by-time interaction on pain intensity on the WOMAC subscale (primary outcome) and on disease severity, physical functional data, balance data, quality of life, global perceived effect scale, and muscle strength (secondary outcomes). Participants will be analyzed for intention-to-treat, and the statistical assessor blinded to the groups. The collection of outcomes 72 h after completion of the 16 weeks of interventions will be the primary measurement point. Follow-up secondary timepoints will be collected at 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64 weeks after the end of interventions, except for pain during the training, which will be measured immediately at the end of each session. Only the comparison of the primary outcome between the HIRE group with each BFR group will be analyzed in the non-inferiority framework, the other comparisons between the BFR groups for the primary outcome, and all secondary outcomes will be interpreted in the superiority framework. DISCUSSION: The results of this clinical trial can point out more clearly to ways to optimize the BFR training with the minimum of pain immediately after training, which will allow the offer of an effective and more adherent strengthening training to patients with knee OA.

trial registrationRegistro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, RBR-93rx9q . Registered on 23 July 2020. Version 1.0.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeResistance TrainingAgedBlood Flow Restriction TherapyEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegional Blood FlowBlood flow restriction trainingKaatsu trainingMuscle strengthOsteoarthritis of kneeResistance training

Identifiers

PMID35033169
PMCPMC8761307
OpenAlexW4206830056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.