Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35033128›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2022

Establishing a novel community-focussed lactation support service: a descriptive case series.

Samantha Griffin, Jo Watt, Sophie Wedekind, Solange Bramer, Yasmin Hazemi-Jebelli, Robert Boyle, Gillian Weaver, Natalie S Shenker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding modifiable barriers to human milk donation in the United Kingdom.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha GriffinDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK.
Jo WattThe Human Milk Foundation, Rothamsted Institute, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Sophie WedekindDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK.
Solange BramerImperial College London Medical School, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Yasmin Hazemi-JebelliImperial College London Medical School, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Robert BoyleDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Gillian WeaverThe Human Milk Foundation, Rothamsted Institute, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
Natalie S ShenkerDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK. natalie.shenker09@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8067-1079
Rothamsted Research · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S017437/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough breastfeeding is widely acknowledged as protecting both infant and maternal health postnatally, a partial or complete shortfall of maternal milk can occur for a range of reasons. In this eventuality, the currently available options for feeding infants are screened donor human milk (DHM), infant formula or unscreened shared human milk. In the UK, DHM has only been widely available in specific clinical contexts for the last 40 years, mainly to reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis in extremely preterm infants alongside optimal support for maternal lactation and breastfeeding. The Hearts Milk Bank (HMB) was established in 2017 as an independent, non-profit human milk bank that aimed to ensure equitable, assured access to screened DHM for neonatal units. As a result of the generosity of mothers, a surplus of DHM rapidly became available and together with lactation support, has since been provided to families with a healthcare referral. This programme has now been formalised for families facing lactational challenges, and DHM stocks are permanently maintained to meet their needs. CASE SERIES: This case series describes the clinical paths of four families who accessed lactation support and DHM from the HMB, along with a description of the process for community provision. To date, the HMB has supported over 300 families. Working collaboratively with key stakeholders, the HMB team has developed a prioritisation strategy based on utilitarian ethical models, protocols that ensure safe handling and appropriateness of use, broader donor recruitment parameters that maintain safety with a pragmatic approach for full term healthy infants, and a process to ensure parents or carers have access to the knowledge needed to give informed consent and use DHM appropriately.

conclusionsStakeholders, including parents, healthcare professionals, and milk banks, will need to discuss priorities for both DHM use and research gaps that can underpin the equitable expansion of services, in partnership with National Health Service (NHS) teams and third-sector organisations that support breastfeeding and maternal mental health.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingState MedicineFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLactationBreast cancerDonor human milkInfant feedingMilk bankPerinatal mental healthSafetySupplementationSurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID35033128
PMCPMC8760776
OpenAlexW4205345133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.