ArticleCancer cell international2022
Application of artificial intelligence in a real-world research for predicting the risk of liver metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using routine biochemical tests enhanced by machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Risk factors, prognostic factors, and nomograms for liver metastasis in stage TScientific reports · 2025Article
- PDT-regulated immune gene prognostic model reveals tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer liver metastases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the prognostic value of serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio in stage III-IV colorectal cancer: development of a nutritional prognostic scoring system.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Nomogram model for predicting long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients with metastasis after treatment: a SEER-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Data-Driven Approach for Personalized Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Distant Metastasis of T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer Based on SEER Database.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Application of machine learning techniques in real-world research to predict the risk of liver metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiver is the most common metastatic site of colorectal cancer (CRC) and liver metastasis (LM) determines subsequent treatment as well as prognosis of patients, especially in T1 patients. T1 CRC patients with LM are recommended to adopt surgery and systematic treatments rather than endoscopic therapy alone. Nevertheless, there is still no effective model to predict the risk of LM in T1 CRC patients. Hence, we aim to construct an accurate predictive model and an easy-to-use tool clinically.
methodsWe integrated two independent CRC cohorts from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER, training dataset) and Xijing hospital (testing dataset). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods were adopted to establish the predictive model.
resultsA total of 16,785 and 326 T1 CRC patients from SEER database and Xijing hospital were incorporated respectively into the study. Every single ML model demonstrated great predictive capability, with an area under the curve (AUC) close to 0.95 and a stacking bagging model displaying the best performance (AUC = 0.9631). Expectedly, the stacking model exhibited a favorable discriminative ability and precisely screened out all eight LM cases from 326 T1 patients in the outer validation cohort. In the subgroup analysis, the stacking model also demonstrated a splendid predictive ability for patients with tumor size ranging from one to50mm (AUC = 0.956).
conclusionWe successfully established an innovative and convenient AI model for predicting LM in T1 CRC patients, which was further verified in the external dataset. Ultimately, we designed a novel and easy-to-use decision tree, which only incorporated four fundamental parameters and could be successfully applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.