Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35032932›Full record

Trial reportMidwifery2022

Experiences of pregnant women and healthcare professionals of participating in a digital antenatal CMV education intervention.

Amy Montague, Tushna Vandrevala, Anna Calvert, I-Ling Yeh, Caroline Star, Asma Khalil, Paul Griffiths, Paul T Heath, Christine E Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amy MontagueCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London.
Tushna VandrevalaCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London.
Anna CalvertPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
I-Ling YehCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London.
Caroline StarCMV Action, United Kingdom.
Asma KhalilPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Paul GriffithsUniversity College London Medical School, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, London, United Kingdom.
Paul T HeathPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christine E JonesPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Room LF102, F Level, South Academic Block,Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.e.jones@soton.ac.uk.
St George's, University of London · GBAction for ME · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to explore the perspectives of participating pregnant women and Health Care Professionals (HCPs) towards receiving and providing cytomegalovirus (CMV) education so that barriers and facilitators towards incorporating CMV in routine antenatal care could be better understood.

designThis process evaluation phase employed a qualitative design using individual, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews.

settingRecruitment and interviews took place within a large teaching hospital from an ethnically diverse area of South-west London

participantsThe study sample included 20 participants: 15 pregnant women, and five HCPs. All participants were involved in a single centre randomized controlled trial of a digital CMV educational intervention in pregnancy.

findingsPregnant participants expressed a strong desire to receive information about CMV as part of routine antenatal care. Although HCPs were accepting of the need for CMV education, it was evident that they felt unequipped to provide this; reasons included lack of time, uncertainty about clinical pathways and concern about the potential emotive impact of CMV education. Pregnant women suggested that expressing behaviour changes as risk reduction rather than prevention, made the behaviours feel more achievable and realistic. The support of partners was considered a key factor in the successful adoption of behavioural changes by pregnant women. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is an onus on HCPs to consider how CMV can be included as part of antenatal education, with messaging framed as risk reducing rather than prevention.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsPrenatal EducationCytomegalovirusDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleAntenatal educationCongenital cytomegalovirusPregnancyQualitativeRisk prevention

Identifiers

PMID35032932
PMCPMC8850414
OpenAlexW4206430247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.