Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35032304›Full record

ReviewJournal of echocardiography2022

Echocardiographic imaging of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices.

Tomio Tran, Parvathi Mudigonda, Claudius Mahr, James Kirkpatrick

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of echocardiography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomio TranUniversity of Washington Medical Center Heart Institute, 1959 Pacific St., Box 356422, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. Tomio@cardiology.washington.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-129X
Parvathi MudigondaUniversity of Washington Medical Center Heart Institute, 1959 Pacific St., Box 356422, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Claudius MahrUniversity of Washington Medical Center Heart Institute, 1959 Pacific St., Box 356422, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
James KirkpatrickUniversity of Washington Medical Center Heart Institute, 1959 Pacific St., Box 356422, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a state of end-organ hypoperfusion due to primary cardiac dysfunction and portends a poor prognosis. Shock refractory to inotropic and vasopressor support is often an indication for mechanical circulatory support. When mechanical support device complications or malfunction arise, echocardiography offers rapid assessment of device position and function. Repositioning can be done under echocardiographic guidance. Despite the widespread use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support, there is a dearth of information regarding echocardiography as it pertains to these devices. In this review, we discuss the utility of echocardiography with percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart-Assist DevicesEchocardiographyHumansShock, CardiogenicCardiogenic shockMechanical circulatory supportVentricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID35032304
OpenAlexW4206713878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.