Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35032288›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2022

What do we know about dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI and how close is it to the clinics? Horizon 2020 GLINT consortium report.

Mina Kim, Afroditi Eleftheriou, Luca Ravotto, Bruno Weber, Michal Rivlin, Gil Navon, Martina Capozza, Annasofia Anemone, Dario Livio Longo, Silvio Aime and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Dynamic glucose-enhanced MRI in brain tumors.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. MRI Contrast Agents in Glycobiology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mina KimDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Afroditi EleftheriouInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RavottoInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bruno WeberInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michal RivlinSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gil NavonSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Martina CapozzaMolecular Imaging Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Annasofia AnemoneMolecular Imaging Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Dario Livio LongoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Torino, Italy.
Silvio AimeMolecular Imaging Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Moritz ZaissMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Kai HerzMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Anagha DeshmaneMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Tobias LindigMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Benjamin BenderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Xavier GolayDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. x.golay@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6447-4446
GLINT consortium

Funding

horizon 2020 framework programme Grant Agreement No 667510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the most devastating diseases that the world is currently facing, accounting for 10 million deaths in 2020 (WHO). In the last two decades, advanced medical imaging has played an ever more important role in the early detection of the disease, as it increases the chances of survival and the potential for full recovery. To date, dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI using glucose-based chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST) has demonstrated the sensitivity to detect both D-glucose and glucose analogs, such as 3-oxy-methyl-D-glucose (3OMG) uptake in tumors. As one of the recent international efforts aiming at pushing the boundaries of translation of the DGE MRI technique into clinical practice, a multidisciplinary team of eight partners came together to form the "glucoCEST Imaging of Neoplastic Tumors (GLINT)" consortium, funded by the Horizon 2020 European Commission. This paper summarizes the progress made to date both by these groups and others in increasing our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms related to this technique as well as translating it into clinical practice.

Indexed as

GlucoseMagnetic Resonance ImagingGlucose3-Oxy-methyl-D-glucoseCancerCESTDGE MRIglucoCESTGlucoseMRI

Identifiers

PMID35032288
PMCPMC8901523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.