Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35032223›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Postmortem brain 7T MRI with minimally invasive pathological correlation in deceased COVID-19 subjects.

Maria da Graça Morais Martin, Vitor Ribeiro Paes, Ellison Fernando Cardoso, Carlos Eduardo Borges Passos Neto, Cristina Takami Kanamura, Claudia da Costa Leite, Maria Concepcion Garcia Otaduy, Renata Aparecida de Almeida Monteiro, Thais Mauad, Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neurological manifestation in COVID-19 disease with neuroimaging studies.American journal of neurodegenerative disease · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria da Graça Morais MartinInstituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, LIM44, Travessa da Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil. Maria.martin@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-9146
Vitor Ribeiro PaesDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ellison Fernando CardosoInstituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, LIM44, Travessa da Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Borges Passos NetoNeurology Department, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristina Takami KanamuraInstituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia da Costa LeiteDepartamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, LIM 44 HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Concepcion Garcia OtaduyInstituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, LIM44, Travessa da Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
Renata Aparecida de Almeida MonteiroDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thais MauadDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando Ferraz da SilvaDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Servico de Verificaçao de Óbitos de São Paulo (SVO), São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Henrique Martins CastroNeurology Department, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Hilario Nascimento SaldivaDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marisa DolhnikoffDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amaro Nunes Duarte-NetoDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain abnormalities are a concern in COVID-19, so we used minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) to investigate it, consisting of brain 7T MR and CT images and tissue sampling via transethmoidal route with at least three fragments: the first one for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis and the remaining fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Two mouse monoclonal anti-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies were employed in immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions.

resultsSeven deceased COVID-19 patients underwent MIA with brain MR and CT images, six of them with tissue sampling. Imaging findings included infarcts, punctate brain hemorrhagic foci, subarachnoid hemorrhage and signal abnormalities in the splenium, basal ganglia, white matter, hippocampi and posterior cortico-subcortical. Punctate brain hemorrhage was the most common finding (three out of seven cases). Brain histological analysis revealed reactive gliosis, congestion, cortical neuron eosinophilic degeneration and axonal disruption in all six cases. Other findings included edema (5 cases), discrete perivascular hemorrhages (5), cerebral small vessel disease (3), perivascular hemosiderin deposits (3), Alzheimer type II glia (3), abundant corpora amylacea (3), ischemic foci (1), periventricular encephalitis foci (1), periventricular vascular ectasia (1) and fibrin thrombi (1). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected with RT-PCR in 5 out of 5 and IHC in 6 out 6 patients (100%).

conclusionsDespite limited sampling, MIA was an effective tool to evaluate underlying pathological brain changes in deceased COVID-19 patients. Imaging findings were varied, and pathological features corroborated signs of hypoxia, alterations related to systemic critically ill and SARS-CoV-2 brain invasion.

Indexed as

AutopsyCOVID-19MRINeuroimagingNeuropathology

Identifiers

PMID35032223
PMCPMC8760871
OpenAlexW4206584206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.