Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35032154›Full record

ReviewChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2022

Process-Structure-Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review.

M Anne Sawhney, Malik Wahid, Santanu Muhkerjee, Rebecca Griffin, Alexander Roberts, Satishchandra Ogale, Jenny Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Process-Structure-Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Anne SawhneyFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Crymlyn Burrows, Skewen, Swansea, SA1 8EN, United Kingdom.
Malik WahidDepartment of Chemistry, Interdisciplinary Division for Renewable Energy and Advanced Materials (iDREAM), NIT Srinagar, Srinagar, 190006, India.
Santanu MuhkerjeeFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Crymlyn Burrows, Skewen, Swansea, SA1 8EN, United Kingdom.
Rebecca GriffinFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Crymlyn Burrows, Skewen, Swansea, SA1 8EN, United Kingdom.
Alexander RobertsResearch Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility, Coventry University, Manor House Drive, Friars House, Coventry, CV1 2TE, United Kingdom.
Satishchandra OgaleIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Dr Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, 411 008, India.
Jenny BakerFaculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Crymlyn Burrows, Skewen, Swansea, SA1 8EN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3530-1957

Funding

Department of Science and Technology (DST) India Grant DST/INSPIRE/04/2017/002798ECR Fellowship NoRESt EP/S03711X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council DTS/INSPIRE/04/2017/002798Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N020863/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P032591/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R023581/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S02252X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S03711X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)European Social Fund via the Welsh Government c80816Materials Research Hub for Energy Conversion, Capture, and Storage (M-RHEX) EP/R023581/1SPECIFIC Innovation and Knowledge Centre EP/N020863/1SPECIFIC Innovation and Knowledge Centre EP/P030831/1UKRI Global Challenge Research Fund project, SUNRISE EP/P032591/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na-ion) cells at research scale, highlighting parameters and techniques that are likely to impact measured cycling performance. Consistent process-structure-performance links have been established for typical lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells, which can guide hypotheses to test in Na-ion cells. Liquid electrolyte viscosity, sequence of mixing electrode slurries, rate of drying electrodes and cycling characteristics of formation were found critical to the reported capacity of laboratory cells. Based on the observed importance of processing to battery performance outcomes, the current focus on novel materials in Na-ion research should be balanced with deeper investigation into mechanistic changes of cell components during and after production, to better inform future designs of these promising batteries.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesSodiumElectrodesIonsLithiumIonsLithiumSodiumcell processingelectrochemistryelectrolyte castingNa-ion; slurry mixing

Identifiers

PMID35032154
PMCPMC9303753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.