ArticleClinical cardiology2022
Value of M2BP in predicting in-stent restenosis in patients after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and bioinformatic study on clinical, paraclinical, and genetic factors predisposing to stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Value of M2BP in predicting in-stent restenosis in patients after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.Clinical cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the association between plasma levels of mac-2 binding protein (M2BP) with the risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
methodsPlasma M2BP levels were compared between 258 patients who experienced ISR at 12-months post-PCI and 258 patients, matched for age and sex, without angiographic evidence of ISR.
resultsThe plasma M2BP level was significantly higher in the ISR than in the non-ISR group. On multivariate analysis, adjusted for potential clinical, biochemical, and angiography characteristics, M2BP remained as an independent significant predictor of ISR.
conclusionsM2BP may be an important predictive biomarker of ISR and may be useful in identifying at-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.