ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2022
Drug Allergy Delabeling Programs: Recent Strategies and Targeted Populations.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Penicillin Allergy Labels, Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Population-Based Cohort Study from China.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- De-Labelling Penicillin Allergies in the Paediatric Emergency Department.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Evaluation of Antibiotic Allergy in the Ambulatory Setting Using a Standardized Questionnaire.Journal of pharmacy practice · 2024Article
- Delabeling of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in hospitalized patients: a prospective study evaluating cost savings.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Beta-lactam antibiotics administration among adult inpatients with a beta-lactam allergy label: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
- Penicillin allergy evaluation in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancy.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Physicians' needs for drug allergy documentation in electronic health records and allergy alert systems: Results of an end user's survey.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug allergy delabeling programs have become an essential element of antibiotic stewardship. Development of delabeling programs involves careful selection of target patient population, thoughtful design of delabeling approach, stakeholder engagement, assembly of key team members, implementation, and evaluation of clinical and safety outcomes. Recent programs have targeted patients thought to be most likely to benefit from removal of inaccurate antibiotic allergy labels, those with β-lactam antibiotic allergies and high-risk populations likely to need β-lactam antibiotics as first-line treatment. This review provides an overview of current risk stratification methods and β-lactam cross-reactivity data and summarizes how different inpatient and outpatient delabeling programs have used these concepts in delabeling algorithms. β-Lactam delabeling programs for inpatients, pediatric patients, and programs utilizing telehealth have been implemented with good outcomes. This review also focuses on delabeling programs for high-risk populations likely to benefit from first-line β-lactam antibiotics. These populations include perioperative, prenatal, and immunocompromised patients. Delabeling programs have been successful in the inpatient and outpatient settings at enabling appropriate antibiotic use. This article reviews delabeling strategies utilized by these programs with a focus on highlighting elements key to their success and future areas for innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35031956What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.