Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031897›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022

Neuromonitoring of the language pathways using cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oleg Titov, Andrey Bykanov, David Pitskhelauri, Gleb Danilov

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07789938 (Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor, Visual and Cortico-cortical Evoked Potentials in Brain Tumor Surgery Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07789938 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor, Visual and Cortico-cortical Evoked Potentials in Brain Tumor Surgery Under General Anesthesia: Prospective Cohort Studies

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2027 to 2029Enrolled166ConditionsIntraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Malignant Brain Tumors, Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring, Cortico-cortical Evoked Potential MonitoringArmsIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, no Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Corpus callosotomy for intractable epilepsy in the pediatric population: value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Intraoperative neurophysiology in pediatric neurosurgery: a historical perspective.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oleg TitovBurdenko Neurosurgery Center, Moscow, Russia. neurolegtitov@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-7777
Andrey BykanovBurdenko Neurosurgery Center, Moscow, Russia.
David PitskhelauriBurdenko Neurosurgery Center, Moscow, Russia.
Gleb DanilovBurdenko Neurosurgery Center, Moscow, Russia.
Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are a surge in activity of one cortical zone caused by stimulation of another cortical zone. Recording of CCEP may be a useful method of intraoperative monitoring of the brain pathways, particularly of the language-related tracts. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, dedicated to the clinical question: Does the CCEP recording effectively predict the postoperative speech deficits in neurosurgical patients? We conducted language-restricted PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane database search for eligible studies of CCEP published until March 2021. There were 4 articles (3 case series and 1 case report), which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 32 patients (30 cases of tumors and 2 cavernomas) included in the analysis were divided into two cohorts - quantitative and qualitative, in accordance with the method of evaluating changes in the amplitude of CCEP after the lesion resection and postoperative alterations in speech function. Quantitative variables were studied using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Categorical variables were compared in groups by Fisher's exact test. We found a strong positive correlation between the decrease in the N1 wave amplitude and the severity of postoperative speech deficits (quantitative cohort: r = 0.57, p = 0.01; qualitative cohort: p = 0.02). Thus, the CCEP method using the N1 wave amplitude as a marker enables to effectively predict postoperative speech outcomes. Nevertheless, the low level of evidence for the included works indicated the necessity for additional research on this issue.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexLanguageBrainElectric StimulationEvoked PotentialsHumansSpeechBrainConnectivityConnectomeCortexCortico-cortical evoked potentialsLanguage

Identifiers

PMID35031897
OpenAlexW4206341985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.