Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031869›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Artificial intelligence prediction of cholecystectomy operative course from automated identification of gallbladder inflammation.

Thomas M Ward, Daniel A Hashimoto, Yutong Ban, Guy Rosman, Ozanan R Meireles

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Learning where to look: scaling parkland grade prediction from surgical videos.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Learning from single timestamps: complexity estimation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas M WardSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WAC 460, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. tmward@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-8657
Daniel A HashimotoSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WAC 460, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Yutong BanSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WAC 460, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Guy RosmanSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WAC 460, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ozanan R MeirelesSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St., WAC 460, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative courses of laparoscopic cholecystectomies vary widely due to differing pathologies. Efforts to assess intra-operative difficulty include the Parkland grading scale (PGS), which scores inflammation from the initial view of the gallbladder on a 1-5 scale. We investigated the impact of PGS on intra-operative outcomes, including laparoscopic duration, attainment of the critical view of safety (CVS), and gallbladder injury. We additionally trained an artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify PGS.

methodsOne surgeon labeled surgical phases, PGS, CVS attainment, and gallbladder injury in 200 cholecystectomy videos. We used multilevel Bayesian regression models to analyze the PGS's effect on intra-operative outcomes. We trained AI models to identify PGS from an initial view of the gallbladder and compared model performance to annotations by a second surgeon.

resultsSlightly inflamed gallbladders (PGS-2) minimally increased duration, adding 2.7 [95% compatibility interval (CI) 0.3-7.0] minutes to an operation. This contrasted with maximally inflamed gallbladders (PGS-5), where on average 16.9 (95% CI 4.4-33.9) minutes were added, with 31.3 (95% CI 8.0-67.5) minutes added for the most affected surgeon. Inadvertent gallbladder injury occurred in 25% of cases, with a minimal increase in gallbladder injury observed with added inflammation. However, up to a 28% (95% CI - 2, 63) increase in probability of a gallbladder hole during PGS-5 cases was observed for some surgeons. Inflammation had no substantial effect on whether or not a surgeon attained the CVS. An AI model could reliably (Krippendorff's α = 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) quantify inflammation when compared to a second surgeon (α = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.87).

conclusionsAn AI model can identify the degree of gallbladder inflammation, which is predictive of cholecystectomy intra-operative course. This automated assessment could be useful for operating room workflow optimization and for targeted per-surgeon and per-resident feedback to accelerate acquisition of operative skills.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitisGallbladder DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremCholecystectomyGallbladderHumansInflammationArtificial intelligenceCholecystectomyComputer VisionDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID35031869
OpenAlexW4205877859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.