ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Artificial intelligence prediction of cholecystectomy operative course from automated identification of gallbladder inflammation.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence assessment of Parkland's grading scale in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step toward real-world outcome prediction.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- The digital scalpel: navigating the future of surgical innovation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Regulating digital surgery to balance safety and innovation: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Learning where to look: scaling parkland grade prediction from surgical videos.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Learning from single timestamps: complexity estimation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: innovations, integration, and future directions.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Validation of the parkland grading scale in predicting the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective cohort study with implications for future artificial intelligence ground truth establishment.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- Automated Operative Phase and Step Recognition in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Development and Preclinical Evaluation of a Deep Learning Neural Network (IDEAL Stage 0).Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in gangrenous cholecystitis: advances in risk factor identification and preoperative prediction-a scoping review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Study - International multicentric minimally invasive liver resection (SIMMILR-4) : a comparison of conventional, digitally enhanced and collaborative robotic with Tele-robotic laparoscopic surgery for colorectal liver metastases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Development and validation of the ENDOLAP artificial intelligence framework for inflammation severity classification in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to model expert panel diagnosis of cholecystitis severity.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Remote robotic surgery: implementing a technology 20 years in the making.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Development of an artificial intelligence system to indicate intraoperative findings of scarring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Retrospective validation of parkland grading scale in a Latin-American high-volume center.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Development of a liver graft assessment expert machine-learning system: when the artificial intelligence helps liver transplant surgeons.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOperative courses of laparoscopic cholecystectomies vary widely due to differing pathologies. Efforts to assess intra-operative difficulty include the Parkland grading scale (PGS), which scores inflammation from the initial view of the gallbladder on a 1-5 scale. We investigated the impact of PGS on intra-operative outcomes, including laparoscopic duration, attainment of the critical view of safety (CVS), and gallbladder injury. We additionally trained an artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify PGS.
methodsOne surgeon labeled surgical phases, PGS, CVS attainment, and gallbladder injury in 200 cholecystectomy videos. We used multilevel Bayesian regression models to analyze the PGS's effect on intra-operative outcomes. We trained AI models to identify PGS from an initial view of the gallbladder and compared model performance to annotations by a second surgeon.
resultsSlightly inflamed gallbladders (PGS-2) minimally increased duration, adding 2.7 [95% compatibility interval (CI) 0.3-7.0] minutes to an operation. This contrasted with maximally inflamed gallbladders (PGS-5), where on average 16.9 (95% CI 4.4-33.9) minutes were added, with 31.3 (95% CI 8.0-67.5) minutes added for the most affected surgeon. Inadvertent gallbladder injury occurred in 25% of cases, with a minimal increase in gallbladder injury observed with added inflammation. However, up to a 28% (95% CI - 2, 63) increase in probability of a gallbladder hole during PGS-5 cases was observed for some surgeons. Inflammation had no substantial effect on whether or not a surgeon attained the CVS. An AI model could reliably (Krippendorff's α = 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) quantify inflammation when compared to a second surgeon (α = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.87).
conclusionsAn AI model can identify the degree of gallbladder inflammation, which is predictive of cholecystectomy intra-operative course. This automated assessment could be useful for operating room workflow optimization and for targeted per-surgeon and per-resident feedback to accelerate acquisition of operative skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.