Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031842›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Risk stratification of abdominal tumors in children with amide proton transfer imaging.

Xuan Jia, Wenqi Wang, Jiawei Liang, Xiaohui Ma, Weibo Chen, Dan Wu, Can Lai, Yi Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuan Jia *Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenqi Wang *Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiawei LiangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaohui MaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Weibo ChenPhilips Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Dan WuKey Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Can LaiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yi ZhangKey Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. yizhangzju@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-1851

Funding

ministry of science and technology of the people's republic of china 2018YFE0114600national natural science foundation of china (cn) 61801421national natural science foundation of china (cn) 61801424national natural science foundation of china (cn) 81971605national natural science foundation of china (cn) 91859201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the potential of molecular amide proton transfer (APT) MRI for predicting the risk group of abdominal tumors in children, and compare it with quantitative T1 and T2 mapping.

methodsThis prospective study enrolled 133 untreated pediatric patients with suspected abdominal tumors from February 2019 to September 2020. APT-weighted (APTw) imaging and quantitative relaxation time mapping sequences were executed for each subject. The region of interest (ROI) was generated with automatic artifact detection and ROI-shrinking algorithms, within which the APTw, T1, and T2 indices were calculated and compared between different risk groups. The prediction performance of different imaging parameters was assessed with the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and Student's t-test.

resultsFifty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, including 24 neuroblastomas (NB), 18 Wilms' tumors (WT), and 15 hepatoblastomas (HB). The APTw signal was significantly (p < .001) higher in patients with high-risk NB than those with low-risk NB, while the difference between patients with low-risk and high-risk WT (p = .69) or HB (p = .35) was not statistically significant. The associated areas under the curve (AUC) for APT to differentiate low-risk and high-risk NB, WT, and HB were 0.93, 0.58, and 0.71, respectively. The quantitative T1 and T2 values generated AUCs of 0.61-0.70 for the risk stratification of abdominal tumors.

conclusionsAPT MRI is a potential imaging biomarker for stratifying the risk group of pediatric neuroblastoma in the abdomen preoperatively and provides added value to structural MRI. KEY POINTS: • Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging showed significantly (p < .001) higher values in pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma than those with low-risk neuroblastoma, but did not demonstrate a significant difference in patients with Wilms' tumor (p = .69) or hepatoblastoma (p = .35). • The associated areas under the curve (AUC) for APT to differentiate low-risk and high-risk neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor, and hepatoblastoma were 0.93, 0.58, and 0.71, respectively. • The quantitative T1 and T2 indices generated AUCs of 0.61-0.70 for dichotomizing the risk group of abdominal tumors.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsAmidesChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesProtonsRisk AssessmentAmidesProtonsAbdomenChildMagnetic resonance imagingRisk Assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.