Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031736›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2022

Do you know your ceramics? Part 1: classification.

Mojgan Talibi, Kiran Kaur, Hussein S Patanwala, Hit Parmar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ceramics overview.British dental journal · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mojgan TalibiAssociate Dentist, West Midlands, UK. drmojgantalibi@gmail.com.
Kiran KaurDental Core Trainee in Restorative Dentistry and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wales, UK.
Hussein S PatanwalaClinical Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, UK; Clinical Lead, Oakville Dental, Birmingham, UK; Clinical Lead, Sutton Dental Care, Sutton Coldfield, UK.
Hit ParmarOwner and Ceramist, Fine Art Dental Studio, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first part of a six-part series exploring the main ceramic materials used for the fabrication of all-ceramic, indirect restorations to aid clinicians in their selection. We have detailed the history of how dental ceramics were introduced and how they have been revolutionised with the help of improvements within technology and understanding of the material. Dental ceramics can be classified in a few ways. One way is according to their ratio of glass to crystalline content and the other is how it is processed. Having a good in-depth understanding of this will allow clinicians to make the best decision for their patients who require ceramic restorations. This article aims to explore all the above to aid clinicians in making that decision.

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsDental PorcelainCeramicsGlassHumansDental MaterialsDental Porcelain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.