Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35031654›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Deep learning-based algorithm for lung cancer detection on chest radiographs using the segmentation method.

Akitoshi Shimazaki, Daiju Ueda, Antoine Choppin, Akira Yamamoto, Takashi Honjo, Yuki Shimahara, Yukio Miki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akitoshi ShimazakiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Daiju UedaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan. ai.labo.ocu@gmail.com.
Antoine ChoppinLPIXEL Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira YamamotoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi HonjoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuki ShimaharaLPIXEL Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio MikiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and validated a deep learning (DL)-based model using the segmentation method and assessed its ability to detect lung cancer on chest radiographs. Chest radiographs for use as a training dataset and a test dataset were collected separately from January 2006 to June 2018 at our hospital. The training dataset was used to train and validate the DL-based model with five-fold cross-validation. The model sensitivity and mean false positive indications per image (mFPI) were assessed with the independent test dataset. The training dataset included 629 radiographs with 652 nodules/masses and the test dataset included 151 radiographs with 159 nodules/masses. The DL-based model had a sensitivity of 0.73 with 0.13 mFPI in the test dataset. Sensitivity was lower in lung cancers that overlapped with blind spots such as pulmonary apices, pulmonary hila, chest wall, heart, and sub-diaphragmatic space (0.50-0.64) compared with those in non-overlapped locations (0.87). The dice coefficient for the 159 malignant lesions was on average 0.52. The DL-based model was able to detect lung cancers on chest radiographs, with low mFPI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, ThoracicRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySolitary Pulmonary Nodule

Identifiers

PMID35031654
PMCPMC8760245
OpenAlexW4205576354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.