ArticleScientific reports2022
Machine learning prediction model of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of machine learning models with conventional statistical methods for prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive performance of machine learning models for kidney complications following coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the role of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Kidney Injury management: a comprehensive review and future research agenda.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- In-hospital electronic monitoring system approaches to epidemiologic investigation and predictive modeling of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2026Article
- From Electrocardiography to the Catheterization Laboratory: A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Framework for Acute Coronary Syndrome Detection and Risk Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identification of Risk Factors and Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Elderly Patients with Heart Failure.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- An interpretable XGBoost model for contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome: development and geographical external validation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Myocardial Infarction Detection via Electrocardiogram: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Applications in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Diagnosis, Outcomes and Management.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Using the Super Learner algorithm to predict risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling for acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a machine learning approach.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Enhancing Coronary Intervention Outcomes Using Intravascular Ultrasound: Analysis of Long-Term Benefits in a Japanese Multicenter Registry.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of periprocedural coronary dissection and perforation for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a Japanese multicenter registry.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Data heterogeneity in federated learning with Electronic Health Records: Case studies of risk prediction for acute kidney injury and sepsis diseases in critical care.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Contrast volume and in-hospital outcomes of dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The traditional risk model provided by the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) is useful for predicting the preprocedural risk of AKI, although the scoring system requires a number of clinical contents. We sought to examine whether machine learning (ML) techniques could predict AKI with fewer NCDR-AKI risk model variables within a comparable PCI database in Japan. We evaluated 19,222 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2008 and 2019 in a Japanese multicenter registry. AKI was defined as an absolute or a relative increase in serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dL or 50%. The data were split into training (N = 16,644; 2008-2017) and testing datasets (N = 2578; 2017-2019). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the light gradient boosting model (GBM) with selected variables by Lasso and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methods among 12 traditional variables, excluding the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, since its use was considered operator-dependent. The incidence of AKI was 9.4% in the cohort. Lasso and SHAP methods demonstrated that seven variables (age, eGFR, preprocedural hemoglobin, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina, heart failure symptoms, and cardiogenic shock) were pertinent. AUC calculated by the light GBM with seven variables had a performance similar to that of the conventional logistic regression prediction model that included 12 variables (light GBM, AUC [training/testing datasets]: 0.779/0.772; logistic regression, AUC [training/testing datasets]: 0.797/0.755). The AKI risk model after PCI using ML enabled adequate risk quantification with fewer variables. ML techniques may aid in enhancing the international use of validated risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.